we think teacjers are wrong to be outraged by ChatGPT and generative Ai
Its an interesting article but it also shows how systems of teachers have lost touch. At its simplest gov2.0 model of Un interacts 5 changes in 1 that I met 7 of the world's most extraordinary educators demanding in 2016 if the new sdgs were to be advanced -1 every way that learning and teaching by under 30s needs to change; ditto 2 every way over 30s; 3 every way we need metaverse (changing global connectivity) coupled with 4 maths of what maps the deepest data communities need to code health and other life critical services around; to introduce AI as 5th force i like to say startrek got beam me up scottie a bit wrong- what we have is ai beaming up and down data from every gps at the say time as being a live operating or interpretaion/artistic system; put all that together and what AI "just do IT" (augment or dilute humanity) depends on integrating quality of first 4 changes. But AI wont wait its already the core. This is how to see UN2 gov2 last chance now Educators could have been in middle of all of this the last 33 years from web1 - having not been its a bit much to complain about ai chatbox. if this viewpoint is correct friends at www.ed3dao.com need heck of a lot of help. They've got a bit distracted by crypto's fraudsters when blockchain maths is i think where we now need matematicains for good. John are you able to talk to leaders of www.nexteinstein.org this week or should we do one more zoom this year?