if basic health nutrition livelihood training not improving - your place needs to sort stuff out

[chris macrae]

here are reasons why we urge you to discover that since parts of world went digital eg late 1980 both 100 times more chip power and worldwide telecom stanards incrasing data flows 100 times pewr decade meant:

better for all were found somewhere

even if your place didnt have the best tech it was possible to adapt relevant models

we can prove tjis by cases - eg have a look at asian wiomen empowerment cases abedmooc.com also celebrated at the 2 main global ed laureat summits wise and yidan prize

we can logically clarify things - for example banking is costly if you8 have to move paper cash safely, write up every transaction manually but eg both kenya and bangladesh developed points models ending the expense of cash for small or remote tracations as soon as a place got linked in with solar and some mobile

consider also an analogy such as weather- truly this only gets better with very best satellite tech and computional power but the models are all interconne4cred so the information from the service is what peoples need into not the livfe model; i9 mention this example because now some are arguing ai will increase divides- no it shouldnt; it may increase misery everywhere that a global databank is being run for bad ends but ithe reality is we have so many human chaslengesd that aonly better data anaksysis can solve

there is one other explanation; ir id true that6 technolgy leaps sometimes require white colar worlers in a particular industry to retrain to deliver a more knowledgable service; and in the case of western banks this went very wrong where to cpontinue emplotuing staff while delivering atm cash - bcnlks chnaged for wanting customers who save to customers who get in card debt; but this is a particulat problem that needed confronting; it is also true t5hat the overall move from carbon to carbon free which we have now had tech potential for over 40 years does mean those working on producing carbon need most support from everyone to get into a new career; and if a country's main asset is carbon and if some treason it hasnt already profited from that then somehow we need to compoensate those peoples whilst also understanding where the leadership finance went wrong

is there really any case (assuming you live in both a peaceful land where professions and emdia are transparent) that tech should not be aoparised for preferential improvemnts pon theose previously most left out if goals 1-5; and in any places where this progress is not nbeing made to elders treaise that by not chnaging they effectively at war with their kids renewability